[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DC148C5AA1CEBA4E87973D432B1C2D8817E79783@P3PWEX4MB008.ex4.secureserver.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:29:21 +0000
From: Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@...ionengravers.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@...oo.com>
CC: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"abbotti@....co.uk" <abbotti@....co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] Staging: comedi: convert while loop to timeout in
ni_mio_common.c
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> Sleep for at least 10, as I think that's the smallest time delay you can
> sleep for anyway (meaning it will be that long no matter what number you
> put there less than 10, depending on the hardware used of course.)
A bit off topic here but I have a somewhat related question about timeouts.
There are a number of comedi drivers that do a "wait for end-of-conversion"
as part of the (*insn_read) for an analog input subdevice or (*insn_write) for
an analog output subdevice. These functions return an errno if a timeout occurs.
Currently either -ETIME or -ETIMEDOUT is returned. This errno ends up getting
returned to the user as the result of the unlocked_ioctl file operation. What is
the more appropriate errno? Or is there is better one that should be used?
Regards,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists