[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140115155405.5682a2de@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:54:05 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/timers 3/4] timers: Reduce future
__run_timers() latency for newly emptied list
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:20:47 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
> index 295837e5e011..bdd1c00ec4ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ static int detach_if_pending(struct timer_list *timer, struct tvec_base *base,
> base->next_timer = base->timer_jiffies;
> }
> base->all_timers--;
> + (void)catchup_timer_jiffies(base);
Why the "(void)" ?
-- Steve
> return 1;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists