[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401152316500.4207@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:22:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/timers] Crude timer-wheel latency hacks
Paul,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The following three patches provide some crude timer-wheel latency
> patches. I understand that a more comprehensive solution is in progress,
> but in the meantime, these patches work well in cases where a given
> CPU has either zero or one timers pending, which is a common case for
> NO_HZ_FULL kernels. So, on the off-chance that this is helpful to
> someone, the individual patches are as follows:
so far that makes sense, though I'd rather like to redesign the whole
timer wheel mess than adding more duct tape to it. I can't dig into
the details right now as I'm dead tired and about to leave for a
funeral. i'll have a detailed look at this at the weekend.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists