[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D71DEA.6020602@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:46:50 -0600
From: "Anna, Suman" <s-anna@...com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 6/7] hwspinlock/omap: enable module before reading SYSSTATUS
register
Felipe,
>
> On 01/14/2014 08:04 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:10:52AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
>>>> b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
>>>> index 9f56fb2..194886e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
>>>> @@ -101,10 +101,23 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>> if (!io_base)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * make sure the module is enabled and clocked before reading
>>>> + * the module SYSSTATUS register
>>>> + */
>>>> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> another thing, you need to check return of pm_runtime_get_sync()
>
> OK, let me check this and your other comment, and the fix is probably a
> separate patch.
>
I realized the changes relevant to your comments were introduced in this
patch, so just refreshed the patch with fixes instead of doing a
separate patch. I didn't do a v5 just for these change, and will do so
if there are more comments on the DT adaptation.
regards
Suman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists