[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140116023040.GB31275@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:30:40 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@...ionengravers.com>
Cc: Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@...oo.com>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"abbotti@....co.uk" <abbotti@....co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Staging: comedi: convert while loop to timeout in
ni_mio_common.c
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:29:21PM +0000, Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > Sleep for at least 10, as I think that's the smallest time delay you can
> > sleep for anyway (meaning it will be that long no matter what number you
> > put there less than 10, depending on the hardware used of course.)
>
> A bit off topic here but I have a somewhat related question about timeouts.
>
> There are a number of comedi drivers that do a "wait for end-of-conversion"
> as part of the (*insn_read) for an analog input subdevice or (*insn_write) for
> an analog output subdevice. These functions return an errno if a timeout occurs.
>
> Currently either -ETIME or -ETIMEDOUT is returned. This errno ends up getting
> returned to the user as the result of the unlocked_ioctl file operation. What is
> the more appropriate errno? Or is there is better one that should be used?
I think they should all be -ETIMEDOUT, -ETIME is used for something
else, and shouldn't be sent to userspace as I don't think it knows what
to do with it.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists