lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:40:41 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch -mm] mm, oom: prefer thread group leaders for display
 purposes

When two threads have the same badness score, it's preferable to kill the 
thread group leader so that the actual process name is printed to the 
kernel log rather than the thread group name which may be shared amongst 
several processes.

This was the behavior when select_bad_process() used to do 
for_each_process(), but it now iterates threads instead and leads to 
ambiguity.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 mm/oom_kill.c   | 12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a815686..b482f49 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1841,13 +1841,17 @@ static void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 				break;
 			};
 			points = oom_badness(task, memcg, NULL, totalpages);
-			if (points > chosen_points) {
-				if (chosen)
-					put_task_struct(chosen);
-				chosen = task;
-				chosen_points = points;
-				get_task_struct(chosen);
-			}
+			if (points < chosen_points)
+				continue;
+			/* Prefer thread group leaders for display purposes */
+			if (points == chosen_points &&
+			    thread_group_leader(chosen))
+				continue;
+
+			if (chosen)
+				put_task_struct(chosen);
+			chosen = task;
+			chosen_points = points;
 		}
 		css_task_iter_end(&it);
 	}
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 054ff47..1dca3d8 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -327,10 +327,14 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned int *ppoints,
 			break;
 		};
 		points = oom_badness(p, NULL, nodemask, totalpages);
-		if (points > chosen_points) {
-			chosen = p;
-			chosen_points = points;
-		}
+		if (points < chosen_points)
+			continue;
+		/* Prefer thread group leaders for display purposes */
+		if (points == chosen_points && thread_group_leader(chosen))
+			continue;
+
+		chosen = p;
+		chosen_points = points;
 	}
 	if (chosen)
 		get_task_struct(chosen);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ