linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 Net-next] ixgbe: define IXGBE_MAX_VFS_DRV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140115.215753.1619877365795484712.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:57:53 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ethan.zhao@...cle.com
Cc:	aaron.f.brown@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ethan.kernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 Net-next] ixgbe: define IXGBE_MAX_VFS_DRV_LIMIT
 macro and cleanup const 63

From: ethan zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:25:01 +0800

> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>

Please don't give two signoffs for yourself, it is not appropriate at
all.

I am very genuinely curious where you got the idea to do that,
particularly as I've never seen anyone else do it before.  So it's
really not possible that you got the idea from someone else's actions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/