[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140116084458.GA9346@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:44:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86: fix 27-rc crash on vsmp due to paravirt
during module load"
* Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit 05e12e1c4c09cd35ac9f4e6af1e42b0036375d72.
>
> The old change from __init --> __init_or_module doesn't make
> sense anymore, given that the arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c code
> is only for non-modular builds.
>
> As of commit 70511134f61bd6e5eed19f767381f9fb3e762d49
> ("Revert "x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit") this file
> became obj-y and hence is only for built-in. That makes
> any "or_module" support redundant.
>
> We need to distinguish between the two in order to do some
> header cleanups. This revert starts that process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
I suspect you want to carry this as part of your header cleanups, to
not have to wait for upstream propagation?
Please fix the title: the original commit was right, but was mooted by
other changes. That's not a revert but a change that happens to be the
inverse of an earlier change.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists