lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140116143749.GA21526@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:37:49 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gaurav Jain <gjain@...com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix JIT profiling on heap

Em Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Gaurav reported that perf cannot profile JIT program if it executes
> the code on heap.  This was because current map__new() only handle JIT
> on anon mappings - extends it to handle no_dso (heap, stack) case too.
> 
> This patch assumes JIT profiling only provides dynamic function
> symbols so check the mapping type to distinguish the case.  It'd
> provide no symbols for data mapping - if we need to support symbols on
> data mappings later it should be changed.

But we do support symbols in data mappings, that is why we have
MAP__VARIABLE, etc, can you elaborate?

Gaurav, do this fixes the problem you reported? Can I have your
Tested-by: tag?

- Arnaldo
 
> Reported-by: Gaurav Jain <gjain@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/map.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.c b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> index 9b9bd719aa19..ee1dd687a262 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/map.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct map *map__new(struct list_head *dsos__list, u64 start, u64 len,
>  		map->ino = ino;
>  		map->ino_generation = ino_gen;
>  
> -		if (anon) {
> +		if ((anon || no_dso) && type == MAP__FUNCTION) {
>  			snprintf(newfilename, sizeof(newfilename), "/tmp/perf-%d.map", pid);
>  			filename = newfilename;
>  		}
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct map *map__new(struct list_head *dsos__list, u64 start, u64 len,
>  			 * functions still return NULL, and we avoid the
>  			 * unnecessary map__load warning.
>  			 */
> -			if (no_dso)
> +			if (type != MAP__FUNCTION)
>  				dso__set_loaded(dso, map->type);
>  		}
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ