[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140116100921.6ecbf214@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:09:21 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: pavel@...linux.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:36:32 +0400
Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@...linux.ru> wrote:
> 16.01.2014 18:18, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:41:16 +0400
> > Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@...linux.ru> wrote:
> >
> >> 16.01.2014 05:58, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> >>> Dear RT Folks,
> >>>
> >>> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.53-rt76-rc1.
> >>
> >> Yap..., mainline is 3.2.54 !
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, but I already had the -rt specific changes merged into 3.2.53
> > before 3.2.54 was released, and then I discovered the cpu hotplug bug.
> > I did not want to release that -rc until it was solved. Now that it is,
> > I can release this one and then move to 3.2.54.
>
>
> $ xz -cd /tmp/patch-3.2.53-rt75-rt76-rc1.patch.xz | patch -p1 --dry-run
>
> checking file arch/arm/kernel/smp_tlb.c
> checking file arch/tile/include/asm/smp.h
> checking file arch/tile/kernel/smp.c
> checking file drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_usb.c
> checking file drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c
> checking file drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c
> checking file fs/buffer.c
> checking file include/linux/smp.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 117 with fuzz 1 (offset 16 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 147.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED
> checking file include/linux/spinlock_rt.h
> checking file kernel/cpu.c
> checking file kernel/rtmutex.c
> checking file kernel/smp.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 712.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
> checking file kernel/softirq.c
> checking file kernel/timer.c
> checking file localversion-rt
>
>
> include/linux/smp.h REJECT: #define on_each_cpu_mask() and #define
> on_each_cpu_cond() and same in kernel/smp.c
>
>
Ouch, thanks for letting me know. I'll give it a try to make sure that
the patch is the same code that I tested.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists