[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140116165425.GA9481@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:54:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: raistlin@...ux.it, juri.lelli@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix __sched_setscheduler() nice test
Subject: sched: Fix __sched_setscheduler() nice test
With the introduction of sched_attr::sched_nice we need to check if
we've got permission to actually change the nice value.
Daniel found that can_nice() would always fail; and upon inspection it
turns out that can_nice() only tests to see if we can lower the nice
value, but it doesn't validate if we're lowering or not.
Therefore amend the test to only call can_nice() when we lower the nice
value.
Cc: raistlin@...ux.it
Cc: juri.lelli@...il.com
Fixes: d50dde5a10f3 ("sched: Add new scheduler syscalls to support an extended scheduling parameters ABI")
Reported-and-Tested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 93a2836b6220..36c951b7eef8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3296,7 +3296,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
*/
if (user && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
if (fair_policy(policy)) {
- if (!can_nice(p, attr->sched_nice))
+ if (attr->sched_nice < TASK_NICE(p) &&
+ !can_nice(p, attr->sched_nice))
return -EPERM;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists