[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140116124207.2065b153@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:42:07 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] preempt: Track unmatched preempt_enable() to
preempt_disable()
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:18:24 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> Back in the original real-time patch there was a nice debug feature
> that tracked where preemption was disabled and not matched by a preempt
> enable. This information made debugging scheduling while atomic much
> easier, especially when a function was buried in a function chain
> that happened just before the schedule. For example:
>
> Although this bug does not happen often, this feature is extremely helpful
> when it does. I decided to take Ingo's code, which was just written for
> debugging the -rt patch, and clean it up for something that is suitable
> for mainline.
>
Hmm, I rewrote this prologue a few times, and even though patch 2 states
this, I want to make it clear that the original feature, that this is
based on, was written by Ingo Molnar. I had it clear in my original
version of the prologue, but somehow it was deleted.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists