[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D82F13.9070309@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:12:19 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [slub shrink] 0f6934bf16: +191.9% vmstat.system.cs
On 01/15/2014 07:07 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> 9a0bb2966efbf30 0f6934bf1695682e7ced973f6
> --------------- -------------------------
> 8235933 ~ 2% +80.6% 14872911 ~ 3% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/read2
> 8235933 +80.6% 14872911 TOTAL interrupts.RES
>
> 9a0bb2966efbf30 0f6934bf1695682e7ced973f6
> --------------- -------------------------
> 161531 ~ 7% +191.9% 471544 ~ 9% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/read2
> 161531 +191.9% 471544 TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
>
> 9a0bb2966efbf30 0f6934bf1695682e7ced973f6
> --------------- -------------------------
> 32943 ~ 1% +71.8% 56599 ~ 3% lkp-sbx04/micro/will-it-scale/read2
> 32943 +71.8% 56599 TOTAL vmstat.system.in
I suspect that something is wrong with that system. My 160-cpu system
does about 40,000 interrupts/sec and ~4300 context switches/sec when
running 160 read2_processes. I wonder if you're hitting swap or the
dirty limits or something. Are you running it with way more threads
than it has CPUs?
Also, are those will-it-scale tests the threaded or process versions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists