[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D8625C.1000902@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:51:08 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
On 01/16/2014 02:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:25:36 +0100 Peter Zijlstra
> <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:46:28AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:19:55 +0100 Peter Zijlstra
>>> <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think the below ought to work
>>>
>>> To be clear, all you did was replace the body of mwait_idle()
>>> with
>>>
>>> mwait_idle_with_hints(0, 0);
>>
>> Pretty much, and add the asm/mwait.h include, otherwise you'll
>> end up with a compile fail.
>>
>>> (and the comment above it)? I need to apply in incremental
>>> patch in the merge commit.
>>
>> I don't think I touched the comment at all.
>
In retrospect this bit probably should have gone through the idle
tree. That was my bad, I need to coordinate with Len better.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists