[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389936047.5567.721.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:20:47 -0800
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
kmo@...erainc.com
Subject: Re: bio_integrity_verify() bug causing READ verify to be silently
skipped
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 15:09 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org> writes:
>
> nab> Given that bio_integrity_verify() is using bio_for_each_segment(),
> nab> the loop starts from the updated bio->bi_idx, and not a zero value,
> nab> which ends up skipping individual bio segment calls to
> nab> bi->verify_fn().
>
> That's botched. Verify is meant to be called with the completed bytes
> before the index is tampered with.
>
>
> nab> The following patch changes bio_integrity_verify() to use
> nab> bio_for_each_segment_all() instead of bio_for_each_segment() to
> nab> ensure that the segment walk always starts from zero, regardless of
> nab> the current bio->bi_idx value after bio_advance().
>
> That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
> changes...
>
Ping..? Any updates on a proper bugfix for this..?
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists