linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/5] tracing/uprobes: Rename uprobe_{trace,perf}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1389946120-19610-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:08:36 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] tracing/uprobes: Rename uprobe_{trace,perf}_print() functions

The uprobe_{trace,perf}_print functions are misnomers since what they
do is not printing.  There's also a real print function named
print_uprobe_event() so they'll only increase confusion IMHO.

Rename them with double underscores to follow convention of kprobe.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 79e52d93860b..c5d2612bf233 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ static void uprobe_buffer_put(struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
 	mutex_unlock(&ucb->mutex);
 }
 
-static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
+static void __uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
 				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
@@ -807,14 +807,14 @@ out:
 static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
-		uprobe_trace_print(tu, 0, regs);
+		__uprobe_trace_func(tu, 0, regs);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void uretprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
 				struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	uprobe_trace_print(tu, func, regs);
+	__uprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs);
 }
 
 /* Event entry printers */
@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
+static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
 				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->tp.call;
@@ -1078,14 +1078,14 @@ static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
 
 	if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
-		uprobe_perf_print(tu, 0, regs);
+		__uprobe_perf_func(tu, 0, regs);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void uretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
 				struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	uprobe_perf_print(tu, func, regs);
+	__uprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs);
 }
 #endif	/* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/