[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eh47v4vc.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:17:27 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Don't leak a path when get_empty_filp in dentry_open
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 03:45:38PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Normally in dentry_open the passed in path is placed on the new filp
>> removing the caller from needing to worry about it. In the rare case
>> that we can not allocate a filp the path is not consumed. None of the
>> callers of dentry_open call path_put in their error handling when
>> dentry_open fails so call path_put for them on error and keep everyone's
>> error handling simple.
>
> You are misreading that code. _No_ path in dentry_open() drops that
> sucker, no matter whether we succeed or fail. do_dentry_open() grabs
> an extra reference on success, so those fput() on other failure exits
> just balance that.
Yep you are right. My mistake. The weird code flow tricked me.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists