[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D87862.2080904@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:25:06 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kim Naru <kim.naru@....com>,
Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, CPU, AMD: Add workaround for family 16h, erratum
793
On 01/16/2014 04:21 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>> We might want to still have a software fix for this just in case
>> someone uses older BIOSes..
>
> There is no "just in case" when it comes to someone using outdated firmware.
> It is a *given*, except for hardware that is only used in HPC and multiple
> (> 2) socket servers/workstations (which might be the case here, I don't
> know what processors we're talking about).
>
> The vast majority of PC users will never update their firmware, unless the
> update is automatically offered to them, and sometimes not even in that
> case.
>
Yes, the real question is: did the broken BIOS ship in production
systems? We don't care about engineering samples/beta boxes, but once
it is sold as a product, it is real.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists