[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140117100723.GB16003@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:07:23 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: perf: support dwarf unwinding in compat mode
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:00:09AM +0000, Jean Pihet wrote:
> On 16 January 2014 14:47, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> So the simplest thing would be to make compat_user_stack_pointer expand to
> >> user_stack_pointer(current_pt_regs()) on arm64 and merge that in with your
> >> original patch fixing user_stack_pointer.
>
> I see 2 issues in your proposal:
>
> 1) user_stack_pointer(regs) calls compat_user_stack_pointer if
> compat_user_mode(regs)) and compat_user_stack_pointer expands to
> user_stack_pointer. I see a circular dependency in the macros.
Not today it doesn't, so you just need to avoid writing the circular
dependency and instead make user_stack_pointer access (regs)->compat_sp
instead.
> 2) current_pt_regs() returns the current task regs although perf
> passes a regs struct that had been recorded previously.
Yes, but compat_user_stack_pointer doesn't take a regs paramater anyway, so
there's no change in behaviour here.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists