[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140117134646.GL27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:46:46 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock in do_page_fault() on ARM (old kernel)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:13:04PM -0500, Alan Ott wrote:
> So my questions are:
> 1. Why don't I see a full backtrace beyond the exception stack? It's the
> same when dump_stack() is called manually.
No idea - it looks like you're not using frame pointers, but are using
the unwinder. Full backtraces can always be created with frame pointers,
it's just that unwinding seems unreliable.
I think we do need to see the full backtrace here - from looking at the
full state dump, I don't see any sign of the mmap_sem being held except
by an attempt to process a fault, and two threads trying to do a
sys_mmap_pgoff().
My suspicion therefore is that some other thread must have died while
holding the mmap_sem, so there's probably a kernel oops earlier...
that's my best guess at the moment without seeing the full backtrace.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists