[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D93FBF.2010609@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:35:43 +0100
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, patches@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Use Parked Address in GIC structure
for spin table SMP initialisation
On 01/17/14 15:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 17 January 2014, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> +/* Parked Address in ACPI GIC structure */
>> +static u64 parked_address[NR_CPUS];
>
> Please use the per_cpu infrastructure rather than NR_CPUS long arrays.
Actually, per_cpu areas are initialized a bit later. If we really want
to use here per_cpu, then we need to implement early_per_cpu
Frankenstein like x86 does.
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists