[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E0BE1322F2F2246BD820DA9FC397ADE014E575D@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:47:15 +0000
From: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] x86, mpx: hook #BR exception handler to allocate
bound tables
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:bp@...en8.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 6:38 PM
> To: Ren, Qiaowei
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin; Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; x86@...nel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86, mpx: hook #BR exception handler to allocate
> bound tables
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:17:15AM +0800, Ren Qiaowei wrote:
> > Yes, I run this with lockdep enabled.
>
> Ok, but you still are doing memory allocation in the exception handler,
> AFAICT:
>
> do_bounds
> |->do_mpx_bt_fault
> |->allocate_bt
> |->sys_mmap_pgoff
> |->vm_mmap_pgoff
> |->do_mmap_pgoff
> |->mmap_region
> |-> kmem_cache_zalloc(vm_area_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>
Sorry for my late reply.
Petkov, could you please detail the problem? Memory allocation can't be done in the eception handler? I guess it is like do_page_fault(), right?
Thanks,
Qiaowei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists