linux-kernel - RE: Why is (2 < 2) true? Is it a gcc bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D9FFE20C522965449E182ACE73889AEB1A6A3592@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:55:39 +0000
From:	"Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@...el.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Why is (2 < 2) true? Is it a gcc bug?

On Friday, January 17, 2014 2:58 PM Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> Can you reproduce this using a standalone test?
> I.e:
> #include <assert.h>
> 
> int main()
> {
>         assert(2 < 2 != 1);
> 
>         return 0;
> }
> 

No, I can't of course.

Lukasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/