lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D95005.8070501@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:45:09 +0100
From:	Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
To:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	"Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <Mike.Miller@...com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"James E. J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen M. Cameron" <scameron@...rdog.cce.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in svn

On 01/17/2014 04:31 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 04:17 PM, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@...hat.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:14 AM
>>> To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev); Andrew Morton; James E. J. Bottomley
>>> Cc: LKML; LKML-scsi; hare@...e.de; Stephen M. Cameron
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in svn
>>>
>>> On 01/16/2014 08:51 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch has every ID we have in our svn repository. Some
>>>> controllers were cancelled, others added, now the cancelled ones are
>>>> back. Apparently the debate rages on about which controllers are
>>>> cancelled, which are not, whatever. Please accept this patch. It is
>>>> dependent upon the patches I sent yesterday.
>>>> This patch made/tested against kernel-3.13.0-rc8
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/scsi/hpsa.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c index
>>>> 348b207..3affec5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id
>>> hpsa_pci_device_id[] = {
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF,     0x103C,
>>> 0x3354},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF,     0x103C,
>>> 0x3355},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF,     0x103C,
>>> 0x3356},
>>>> +	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1920},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1921},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1922},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1923},
>>>> @@ -108,15 +109,19 @@ static const struct pci_device_id
>>> hpsa_pci_device_id[] = {
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1926},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1928},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x1929},
>>>> +	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C,
>>> 0x192A},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21BD},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21BE},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21BF},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C0},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C2},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C3},
>>>> +	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C4},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C5},
>>>> +	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C6},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C7},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C8},
>>>> +	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21C9},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21CA},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21CB},
>>>>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C,
>>> 0x21CC},
>>>> @@ -149,22 +154,29 @@ static struct board_type products[] = {
>>>>  	{0x3354103C, "Smart Array P420i", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x3355103C, "Smart Array P220i", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x3356103C, "Smart Array P721m", &SA5_access},
>>>> +	{0x1920103C, "Smart Array P430i", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1921103C, "Smart Array P830i", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1922103C, "Smart Array P430", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1923103C, "Smart Array P431", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1924103C, "Smart Array P830", &SA5_access},
>>>> +	{0x1925103C, "Smart Array P831", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1926103C, "Smart Array P731m", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1928103C, "Smart Array P230i", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x1929103C, "Smart Array P530", &SA5_access},
>>>> +	{0x192A103C, "Smart Array P531", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x21BD103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x21BE103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x21BF103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>>>>  	{0x21C0103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>>>> +	{0x21C1103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>>> I think that both tables should be in sync - but there is no 0x21c1 in
>>> hpsa_pci_device_id (and the 0x1925), could you clarify that?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tomas
>> Crap. It seems like these menial tasks get the better of me. I'll correct and resubmit.
>>
> Hmm. Seeing that hpsa is now well capable of supporting even older
> SmartArray controllers, is there really a point in updating the
> PCI-ID list every time?

It depends on whether HP actually wishes to support even the oldest cciss
devices this way, I'm not sure if all the devices were individually tested with hpsa driver.

Cheers, Tomas

> Wouldn't you be better off by just using the catch-all phrase
> and remove all the individual IDs?
>
> That way you would just have to update _one_ list ...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ