| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:27:08 +0100 From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr> To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: use irq for connection status and EDID read On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:26:21 +0100 Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> wrote: > On 01/12/2014 07:51 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:35:21 +0100 > > Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> wrote: > > > >> At least for the DT part, I'd suggest to not ask for interrupt directly > >> but use a proper gpios property. The can of course be converted to > >> priv->int_irq in some tda998x_dt_probe. > > > > May you give me more information? > > Sure, see [1]. > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-May/038822.html Thanks for the link, but I still don't see the advantage of the gpio (which value?) over the irq number. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists