[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D96B9D.703@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:42:53 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kim Naru <kim.naru@....com>,
Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, CPU, AMD: Add workaround for family 16h, erratum
793
On 01/17/2014 09:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> No, you don't. :-)
>
> You would much prefer to have the workaround done in the BIOS and only
> if there's a coverage hole, only then to do it in the kernel.
>
Hence the question: did an unfixed BIOS ever make it into a shipping
production system? Because if it did, we do have a coverage hole.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists