[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140117182528.GK8715@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:25:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kim Naru <kim.naru@....com>,
Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, CPU, AMD: Add workaround for family 16h, erratum 793
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:05:37PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> On 1/17/2014 11:42 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >Hence the question: did an unfixed BIOS ever make it into a shipping
> >production system? Because if it did, we do have a coverage hole.
> >
> Right, and the answer to your question is: there is a *chance* it
> did.. From internal discussions, I could gather that the fix went into
> BIOS code earlier for desktop/mobile versions than it did for server
> versions;
>
> So there is a chance production systems (desktop ones) might never see
> the issue, but server ones will, as BIOSes spun only from now onwards
> will have the workaround..
This is exactly what I mean: I would like to have this question answered
before any erratum fix goes into the kernel.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists