[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D977D4.3060708@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:05:00 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Sumanth <sumantk2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs null_blk: Null pointer deference problem in alloc_page_buffers
On 01/17/2014 11:09 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk.c b/drivers/block/null_blk.c
>> index a2e69d2..6b0e049 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/null_blk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/null_blk.c
>> @@ -535,6 +535,11 @@ static int null_add_dev(void)
>> if (!nullb)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + if (bs > PAGE_SIZE) {
>> + WARN(1, "Invalid block size. Setting it to 4096\n");
>> + bs = 4096;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Why are you hard-coding 4k instead of just using PAGE_SIZE?
>
Thanks Jeff. Yes,that makes sense. will change.
(got same suggestion from reporter here too)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists