[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1401171419370.25844@AMR>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:01:10 -0700 (MST)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] nvme: Fix invalid call to
irq_set_affinity_hint()
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com> wrote:
>> In case MSI-X and MSI initialization failed the function
>> irq_set_affinity_hint() is called with uninitialized value
>> in dev->entry[0].vector. This update fixes the issue.
>
> dev->entry[0].vector is initialized in nvme_dev_map(), and it's used
> for free_irq() above the area of your patch, so I don't think this is
> actually a bug, though it might be somewhat confusing.
It is confusing, but there's a reason. :)
We send a single command using legacy irq to discover how many msix
vectors we want. The legacy entry needs to be set some time before calling
request_irq in nvme_configure_admin_queue, but also within nvme_dev_start
(for power-management). I don't think there's a place to set it that
won't look odd when looking at nvme_setup_io_queues. I settled on
'nvme_dev_map' was because 'nvme_dev_unmap' invalidates the entries,
so this seemed to provide some amount of symmetry.
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/nvme-core.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
>> index 26d03fa..e292450 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
>> @@ -1790,15 +1790,15 @@ static int nvme_setup_io_queues(struct nvme_dev *dev)
>> vecs = 32;
>> for (;;) {
>> result = pci_enable_msi_block(pdev, vecs);
>> - if (result == 0) {
>> - for (i = 0; i < vecs; i++)
>> - dev->entry[i].vector = i + pdev->irq;
>> - break;
>> + if (result > 0) {
>> + vecs = result;
>> + continue;
>> } else if (result < 0) {
>> vecs = 1;
>> - break;
>> }
>> - vecs = result;
>> + for (i = 0; i < vecs; i++)
>> + dev->entry[i].vector = i + pdev->irq;
>> + break;
>> }
>> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists