linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, CPU, AMD: Add workaround for family 16h, erratum 793

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D9B408.4020007@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:51:52 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kim Naru <kim.naru@....com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, CPU, AMD: Add workaround for family 16h, erratum
 793

On 01/17/2014 02:50 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:28:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Would it make sense to printk() a warning?
> 
> No because people come and start bitching about their dmesg containing
> a warning and whether their hardware is b0rked without even reading the
> actual words.
> 

Printing a warning is appropriate if we can't actually fix the problem
in the OS.  If we actually make the problem go away then we have just
done our job and we can be done with it.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/