[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaFzWw-5zM2dLmBLYt-90U3Yy3iuOhoi-aUWsqcbyOBUCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:21:09 -0800
From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>
Cc: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@...il.com>,
Philip Rakity <prakity@...dia.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: fix possible scheduling while atomic
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net> wrote:
> Hi, adding Aisheng,
>
> On Fri, Jan 17 2014, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@...il.com> wrote:
>>> There's an existing patch for that...
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg296596.html
>>
>> Ah, I see. Looks like it has yet to be picked up...
>
> The patches aren't quite identical -- Andrew's leaves the
> disable_irq() call in and Aisheng's removes it. Which should I take?
Since the disable_irq() is now redundant, I suppose Aisheng's is more correct.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
> --
> Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net> <http://printf.net/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists