linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / idle: Move idle_boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D9FA72.5020505@linaro.org>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:52:18 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / idle: Move idle_boot_override out of the arch
 directory

On 2014-1-18 11:45, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2014-1-17 20:06, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 17/01/14 02:03, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Move idle_boot_override out of the arch directory to be a single enum
>>> including both platforms values, this will make it rather easier to
>>> avoid ifdefs around which definitions are for which processor in
>>> generally used ACPI code.
>>>
>>> IDLE_FORCE_MWAIT for IA64 is not used anywhere, so romove it.
>>>
>>> No functional change in this patch.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Alan <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>> ---
[...]
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
>>> index 03e235ad..e324561 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
>>> @@ -220,6 +220,14 @@ void cpu_idle(void);
>>>  
>>>  void cpu_idle_poll_ctrl(bool enable);
>>>  
>>> +enum idle_boot_override {
>>> +	IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0,
>>> +	IDLE_HALT,
>>> +	IDLE_NOMWAIT,
>>> +	IDLE_POLL,
>>> +	IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> I do understand the idea behind this change, but IMO HALT and MWAIT are x86
>> specific and may not make sense for other architectures.
> 
> yes, this is the strange part, the value is arch-dependent.
> 
>>
>> It will also require every architecture using ACPI to export
>> boot_option_idle_override which may not be really required.
> 
> so, how about forget this patch and move boot_option_idle_override
> related code into arch directory such as arch/x86/acpi/boot.c for
> x86?

The general idea is that we can move all the arch-dependent codes
in ACPI driver to arch directory, then make codes in drivers/acpi/
arch independent.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/