[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CE7DF1D3-12AE-4A97-BF05-84FF223C8520@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:45:38 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/kmemleak: add support for re-enable kmemleak at runtime
On 18 Jan 2014, at 08:41, Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 2014/1/17 20:04, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:40:02AM +0000, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>>> Now disabling kmemleak is an irreversible operation, but sometimes
>>> we may need to re-enable kmemleak at runtime. So add a knob to enable
>>> kmemleak at runtime:
>>> echo on > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>>
>> It is irreversible for very good reason: once it missed the initial
>> memory allocations, there is no way for kmemleak to build the object
>> reference graph and you'll get lots of false positives, pretty much
>> making it unusable.
>
> Do you mean we didn't trace memory allocations during kmemleak disable period,
> and these memory may reference to new allocated objects after re-enable?
Yes. Those newly allocated objects would be reported as leaks.
Catalin--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists