[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140118200822.5d41ffce@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:08:22 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] preempt: Debug for possible missed preemption
checks
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:52:53 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Given that the merge window will probably open today or tomorrow, I would
> prefer any new code not intended for 3.14 not be added to linux-next
> until after v3.14-rc1 to avoid unneeded conflicts. If, however, Andrew
> thinks it is still worth the (maybe minimal) pain, then fine.
I'm not sure this is even intended for 3.15 either ;-)
I'm fine with waiting, to keep from adding any extra pain just before a
merge window. I guess the question is, is it OK to keep it in
linux-next for 3.15 even though it may not even go into 3.15? Depends
on how useful it proves to be. Perhaps it may require staying in
linux-next till 3.16.
Perhaps in order to keep merge windows from being an issue, I can add it
at each -rc1, and remove it at -rc6, if it didn't catch any bugs. But as
soon as it does catch a bug, we can say it's worth going into mainline.
Does that sound fine with you?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists