linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] DMA: Freescale: change BWC from 256 bytes to 1024 bytes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140120074349.GH26823@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:13:49 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	hongbo.zhang@...escale.com
Cc:	dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	scottwood@...escale.com, LeoLi@...escale.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMA: Freescale: change BWC from 256 bytes to 1024 bytes

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:10:53PM +0800, hongbo.zhang@...escale.com wrote:
> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@...escale.com>
> 
> Freescale DMA has a feature of BandWidth Control (ab. BWC), which is currently
> 256 bytes and should be changed to 1024 bytes for best DMA throughput.
> Changing BWC from 256 to 1024 will improve DMA performance much, in cases
> whatever one channel is running or multi channels are running simultanously,
> large or small buffers are copied.  And this change doesn't impact memory
> access performance remarkably, lmbench tests show that for some cases the
> memory performance are decreased very slightly, while the others are even
> better.
> Tested on T4240.

Applied, thanks

--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/