[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140120123045.GV7444@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:30:46 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
andreas.dilger@...el.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
bergwolf@...il.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
oleg.drokin@...el.com, jacques-charles.lafoucriere@....fr,
jinshan.xiong@...el.com, linux-metag@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: lustre: include: add
"__attribute__((packed))" for the related union
Ah. From so metag is a new arch and not a compiler like the changelog
says.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:56:47AM +0000, James Hogan wrote:
> struct a {
> struct b {
> unsigned int x;
> unsigned short y;
> } x;
> unsigned short y;
> } __packed;
This is not the code we are discussing. It should look like:
struct a {
union {
short x;
short y;
}
short z;
};
Any normal person would assume that sizeof(struct a) would be 4 but
apparently on metag it is 8. That totally defeats the point of using
a union in the first place. It's easy enough to add a __packed to the
lustre declaration but I expect this to cause an endless stream of bugs.
It it is really stupid.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists