linux-kernel - Re: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:30:10 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@...il.com>
Cc:	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs?

On 20 January 2014 19:29, Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Viresh,

Hi Lei,

> I have one question regarding unbounded workqueue migration in your case.
> You use hotplug to migrate the unbounded work to other cpus, but its cpu mask
> would still be 0xf, since cannot be changed by cpuset.
>
> My question is how you could prevent this unbounded work migrate back
> to your isolated cpu?
> Seems to me there is no such mechanism in kernel, am I understand wrong?

These workqueues are normally queued back from workqueue handler. And we
normally queue them on the local cpu, that's the default behavior of workqueue
subsystem. And so they land up on the same CPU again and again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/