[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140120201525.GA31416@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:15:25 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 2/2] Change khugepaged to respect MMF_THP_DISABLE
flag
On 01/20, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> No, definitely not. Upon review, khugepaged_test_exit is the wrong
> place to do this check. I think I need to move it up to
> khugepaged_scan_mm_slot for this to work correctly.
Why? unless a MMF_THP_DISABLE task does madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE)
khugepaged_scan_mm_slot() should never see its ->mm ?
Although I got lost a bit, and probably misunderstood... but it
seems to me that whatever you do this patch should not touch
khugepaged_scan_mm_slot.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists