linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:49:02 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	jslaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register_driver call to
	device probe

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:03:40AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:16:57 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> [I did post a reply to this while on my phone but it got rejected]
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > But yes I agree about the idiom, but a definite NAK to any attempts to
> > > plaster over this grand screwup by crapping in the tty core. Your turd,
> > > deal with it locally in the ARM code if you can't apply common sense and
> > > just go dynamic.
> > 
> > I believe at the time there was no one maintaining the device list to
> > _do_ that allocation - AMBA PL011 came along in 2005 after (I believe)
> > hpa stopped looking after that list.
> 
> git log Documentation/devices.txt

Hmm.  Given that git history starts at 2.6.12-rc2, and this was introduced
in 2.5 kernels, there's no point me looking, because I know the history
I have access to does not go back to that time.

And I know for certain that the devices list *did* fall out of maintainership
for a while.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/