[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121100311.GA8847@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:03:12 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Cleanup nvme_dev_start() and fix IRQ leak
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:48:56PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >This is an attempt to make handling of admin queue in a
> >single scope. This update also fixes a IRQ leak in case
> >nvme_setup_io_queues() failed to allocate enough iomem
> >and bailed out with -ENOMEM errno.
>
> This definitely seems to improve the code flow, but this leak was already
> fixed in the latest linux-nvme tree with this commit:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-nvme.git/commit/c5dc9192d52a4a3a479f701e97386347d454af84
Oh, that one seems to complicate things even further to me.
Whould you consider the revert?
Sending an improved version against your tree.
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists