[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121135854.GE21195@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:58:54 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Nate Eldredge <nate@...tsmathematics.com>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>, adilger@...ger.ca,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maarten-baert@...mail.com, mingo@...e.hu,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: math_state_restore and kernel_fpu_end disable interrupts?
On Mon 20-01-14 19:22:51, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, George Spelvin wrote:
>
> >>It's credited to Suresh Siddha, whom I've cc'ed (along with others who
> >>signed off). Suresh, if you're still around, could you comment on why
> >>math_state_restore always leaves interrupts disabled, regardless of their
> >>state on entry? Is there a deep reason or is it a bug?
> >
> >What the comments seemed to be implying was that it was a bug to enter
> >this code with interrupts enabled. So the problem may be a little bit
> >more systemic; expert counsel is required.
>
> It would be kind of weird for code that requires disabled interrupts
> on entry to turn around and enable interrupts itself. I agree that
> it would really help for a guru to take a look...
>
> On which note, Suresh's email bounced :-(
Guys, since this is lurking without proper attention for a rather long
time, can you just write a patch which fixes the problem as far as you can
tell, test that the patch indeed fixes your problems and if yes, send it
to Ingo & LKML. If nothing else it should get you more attention.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists