[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DE7EBD.1000908@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:05:49 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/kaslr for v3.14
On 01/21/2014 06:03 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/21/2014 02:27 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hm, live annotation of the kernel image is a relatively new perf
>>> feature, and KASLR predated that (by years) - which would at least in
>>> part explain why it went unnoticed. (Although it does not excuse the
>>> lack of testing.)
>>
>> kASLR is new, but on 32 bits we have relocated the kernel for a long
>> time. [...]
>
> I doubt many people develop on 32-bit x86, and the group of people
> looking at annotated 32-bit assembly kernel profiles ought to be
> another order of magnitude smaller than that ...
>
Yes... I was commenting on the statement that "kASLR predated that by
years". It hasn't been common.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists