[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1W5c8k-0036ba-7A@intern.SerNet.DE>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:17:08 +0100
From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@...Net.DE>
To: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
wine-devel@...ehq.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add O_DENY* support for VFS and CIFS/NFS
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 05:31:39PM +0400, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
> It's not possible with the current API to do it through open syscall.
> Another possibility is to look at /proc/locks. But I think we really
> need O_DELETE flag that will force a file to be removed on close - we
> will be able to do O_DENYDELETE checks atomically.
I don't depend on this at open time. I can do it later with
some syscall, that's fine. I just want to find a way to do
it correctly. The problem is -- you can't "try" an unlink.
So we have to probe whether we can unlink. And opening for
O_DENYDELETE by no means says we *will* unlink. We just have
to keep the option to do it exclusively.
With best regards,
Volker
--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt@...net.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists