[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121095559.67b86d9c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:55:59 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com,
harald.gustafsson@...csson.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
bruce.ashfield@...driver.com, rob@...dley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:46:06 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > activates - released?
> >
> > Since real-time papers from different rt-campus around the academia insist
> > on using *slightly* different terminology, perhaps add a short dictionary
> > for some of the more common terms?
>
> Oh gawd, they really don't conform with their definitions? I'd not
> noticed that.
>
> > D: relative deadline, typically N ms after release
>
> You failed to define release :-) Its the 'wakeup' event, right? Where
> the activation would be the moment we actually schedule the
> job/instance?
It took me about 20 seconds to figure out what a "release" was too. ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists