[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121001657.GO15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:16:57 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
jslaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register_driver call to
device probe
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> But yes I agree about the idiom, but a definite NAK to any attempts to
> plaster over this grand screwup by crapping in the tty core. Your turd,
> deal with it locally in the ARM code if you can't apply common sense and
> just go dynamic.
I believe at the time there was no one maintaining the device list to
_do_ that allocation - AMBA PL011 came along in 2005 after (I believe)
hpa stopped looking after that list.
So, please tell me how a number could be allocated properly without the
device numbers list being maintained?
I've no problem with going dynamic, and I suggest that you get a sense
of perspective rather than just spouting rubbish from on high.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists