[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DEA933.6080907@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:06:59 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32
On 12/27/2013 02:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> X32 uses the same kernel system call interface as x86-64 for many
> system calls. However, "long" is 64-bit for x86-64 and is 32-bit for
> x32. Where long or unsigned long are used in struct types for such
> system calls, they are wrong for x32. __kernel_[u]long_t is [unsigned]
> long for all ABIs other than x32. I am submitting 8 patches to replace
> long or unsigned long with __kernel_[u]long_t so that those struct types
> can be used with x32 system calls.
>
> H.J. Lu (8):
> Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex
> Use __kernel_long_t/__kernel_ulong_t in <linux/resource.h>
> Use __kernel_ulong_t in uapi struct ipc64_perm
> Use __kernel_long_t in struct msgbuf
> Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64_ds
> Use __kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds
> Use __kernel_ulong_t in shmid64_ds/shminfo64/shm_info
> Use __kernel_long_t in struct mq_attr
>
As Catalin indirectly pointed out, I had made a followup to the wrong
version of the patchset (because I commented to Christoph's feedback.)
This is threaded to the proper version (without unnecessary #if
__BITS_PER_LONG.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists