linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] lockdep: pack subclass/trylock/read/check into a single argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:27:37 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lockdep: pack subclass/trylock/read/check into a
	single argument

On 01/21, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I tried the below but filed to see my vmlinux shrink, maybe I'm just not
> building the right kernel, or otherwise GCC is stupid.

...

> +struct lockdep_acquire_flags {
> +	unsigned long subclass : 3;
> +	unsigned long trylock  : 1;
> +	unsigned long read     : 2;
> +	unsigned long check    : 1;
> +};

Yes, I tried this too. I do see the difference, but the result is worse:

	- 5262832
	+ 5256987

looks like, gcc is not smart enough...

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/