[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121184310.GA24702@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:43:10 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lockdep: pack subclass/trylock/read/check into a
single argument
On 01/21, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > I tried the below but filed to see my vmlinux shrink, maybe I'm just not
> > building the right kernel, or otherwise GCC is stupid.
> >
> > -extern void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
> > - int trylock, int read, int check,
> > - struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip);
> > +struct lockdep_acquire_flags {
> > + unsigned long subclass : 3;
> > + unsigned long trylock : 1;
> > + unsigned long read : 2;
> > + unsigned long check : 1;
> > +};
>
> As it's only 7 bits here, could we pack them into a char ?
Do you mean __attribute__((packed)) ?
Suprizingly it helps a bit. Still "size vmlinux" is worse than with
bitmasks.
But I agreed that the code looks simpler with bitfields, so perhaps
this patch is better.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists