| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140121141042.63cb5040@ultegra>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:10:42 -0800
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pm/qos: allow state control of qos class
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:17:01 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:28:16 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On 11/27/2013 12:20 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > When power capping or thermal control is needed, CPU QOS latency
> > > cannot be satisfied. This patch adds a state variable to indicate
> > > whether a QOS class (including all constraint requests) should be
> > > ignored.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Honestly, I don't like this. I know the motivation and what you're
> > trying to achieve, but I don't like the approach.
> >
> > I need to think a bit more about that.
>
> So the reason I don't like this patch is mainly because it affects
> all of the users of struct pm_qos_constraints and
> pm_qos_read_value(), which include device PM QoS among other things,
> but it only really needs to affect PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY.
>
> I would add a special routine, say pm_qos_cpu_dma_latency(), for
> reading the current effective PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY constraint and
> checking whether or not it should be ignored. Then, I'd make cpuidle
> use that.
>
Agreed, it was a little too broad. I will send an updated patch soon.
Alternatively, can we add a special check for ignored system wide QOS
class in:
int pm_qos_request(int pm_qos_class)
i.e.
diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
index 8dff9b4..9342da4 100644
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -286,10 +286,28 @@ bool pm_qos_update_flags(struct pm_qos_flags *pqf,
*/
int pm_qos_request(int pm_qos_class)
{
- return pm_qos_read_value(pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints);
+ struct pm_qos_constraints *c;
+
+ c = pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints;
+ if (c->state == PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED)
+ return PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE;
+ return pm_qos_read_value(c);
Then we don't have to add a special routine just for CPU_DMA_LATENCY
class. It does not affect other system wide QOS classes unless the
state is set to be ignored.
> Thanks!
>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 10 +++++++++-
> > > kernel/power/qos.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> > > index 5a95013..648b50b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> > > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > >
> > > -enum {
> > > +enum pm_qos_class {
> > > PM_QOS_RESERVED = 0,
> > > PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY,
> > > PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY,
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ enum {
> > > PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +enum pm_qos_state {
> > > + PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_AVAILABLE,
> > > + PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > enum pm_qos_flags_status {
> > > PM_QOS_FLAGS_UNDEFINED = -1,
> > > PM_QOS_FLAGS_NONE,
> > > @@ -77,6 +82,7 @@ struct pm_qos_constraints {
> > > struct plist_head list;
> > > s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */
> > > s32 default_value;
> > > + enum pm_qos_state state;
> > > enum pm_qos_type type;
> > > struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
> > > };
> > > @@ -123,6 +129,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class,
> > > struct notifier_block *notifier); int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int
> > > pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier); int
> > > pm_qos_request_active(struct pm_qos_request *req); s32
> > > pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c); +void
> > > pm_qos_set_constraint_class_state(enum pm_qos_class class,
> > > + enum pm_qos_state state);
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > enum pm_qos_flags_status __dev_pm_qos_flags(struct device *dev,
> > > s32 mask); diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
> > > index 8dff9b4..cf475b0 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/power/qos.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
> > > @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct
> > > pm_qos_constraints *c)
> > > s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c)
> > > {
> > > + /* return invalid default value if constraints cannot be
> > > met, e.g.
> > > + * during idle injection.
> > > + */
> > > + if (c->state == PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED)
> > > + return PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE;
> > > return c->target_value;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -353,6 +358,25 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct
> > > pm_qos_request *req, }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_add_request);
> > >
> > > +void pm_qos_set_constraint_class_state(enum pm_qos_class class,
> > > + enum pm_qos_state state)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pm_qos_constraints *c =
> > > pm_qos_array[class]->constraints;
> > > + unsigned long curr_value;
> > > +
> > > + if (c->state == state)
> > > + return;
> > > + curr_value = (state == PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED) ?
> > > + PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE : c->target_value;
> > > + c->state = state;
> > > +
> > > + /* notify existing QOS requests change */
> > > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(c->notifiers,
> > > + curr_value,
> > > + NULL);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_set_constraint_class_state);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * pm_qos_update_request - modifies an existing qos request
> > > * @req : handle to list element holding a pm_qos request to use
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[Jacob Pan]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists