[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121225740.GP18269@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:57:40 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ux-sunxi.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] of: mtd: add NAND timings retrieval support
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:03:01PM +0100, boris brezillon wrote:
> >>Pick a mode value that fits all the parameters of the connected
> >>non-ONFI flash.
> >>
> >>This would be instead of defining each parameter
> >>individually.. Provide some helpers to convert from a onfi mode number
> >>to all the onfi defined timing parameters so that drivers can
> >>configure the HW..
> >
> >Are you suggesting we should provide a function that converts these
> >modes into a nand_timings struct, or just use the timing modes and
> >let the NAND controller drivers configure its IP accordingly ?
Either seems reasonable to me, but passing the ONFI mode directly from
the NAND core to the driver seems a little safer..
The NAND core can provide a helper function to xlate the mode number
to the timing struct to help drivers that need broken out timing.
> >I found the ONFI timing tables in this document:
> >
> >www.*onfi*.org/~/media/*ONFI*/specs/*onfi*_3_1_spec.pdf (chapter 4.16).
> >
> >I suppose my nand_timings struct should use the names described
> >page 110-111 (at least if we decide to use nand_timings and not
> >nand_timing_modes), right ?
Yah, I think follow the standard. The standard has timing diagrams
that show what all these parameters actually are.
> After taking a closer look at this document, the only parameter
> available in my nand_timings struct that is not defined in the
> standard is tR_max (data transfer from cell to register).
Maybe it can be derived from the other parameters? The ONFI values
seemed pretty comprehensive to me.
I think the mvebu driver was similar, not all of the ONFI values were
used and some translation was needed.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists